STORY UPDATE: A Day After Calling for "Pause" In Vaccination Programs, Britain's John Campbell Makes Case For Ending Covid Vaccinations Entirely
Will New Orleans' Health Authority Jenny Avegno Take Heed And Demand End to Vaccinations Because of Risks From Adverse Events?
The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine caused one serious adverse event per 100,000 recipients. The vaccine was pulled.
1999, and the RotaVirus vaccine, Rotashield, caused 1 to 2 serious adverse effects per 10,000 recipients. The vaccine was withdrawn.
Covid Vaccines now causing 1 serious adverse reaction per 800 recipients, and it’s “safe and effective” and you and every five-year-old you know should be getting boosted.
The UK’s John Campbell is calling out the lie that is “safe and effective.” He’s calling out Dr. Fauci’s lies.
Your humble writer, proudly unvaccinated, has been calling out these lies from the very start.
See Campbell’s presentation of these facts HERE with his 31 Dec 2022 entry on YouTube.
30 Dec ‘22
With 2.6 million YouTube subscribers, the UK’s John Campbell has provided guidance regarding health decisions and Covid since early 2020. The BEC has given him some looks, but gravitated more toward others, Ivor Cummins and Geert Vanden Bossche, for example. Campbell has been supportive of vaccination programs…
Until now.
John Campbell’s call for “a pause” ought to be a call for an outright and immediate end of the vaccination programs, for everyone. But we’ll take our victories small or large and wherever we get them.
To avoid YouTube censorship, or the risk of being banned from YouTube outright, Campbell has posted his video statement on Rumble, which you can access HERE.
Because Rumble + Substack get a bit glitchy, here’s the URL:
https://rumble.com/v22ugd2-time-to-pause-covid-mass-vaccination.html
And Campbell’s statement:
In my view the UK health authorities should pause the current covid-19 vaccination programme, due to the risks associated with vaccination.
As time has passed since the early days of 2020, the number of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 infection has continued to decline since it’s peaks in previous waves. This is clearly seen in data published by the UK government and the Office for National Statistics.
In addition, the proportion of patients in hospital with COVID-19 is now greater than the patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19. This is true for general hospital admissions as well as ICU admissions. In other words, most Covid positive patients admitted to hospital are now incidental, and were not admitted purely for COVID-19 complications.
As a result of mass infection during the various waves of the pandemic, especially the huge numbers of people infected with the omicron variant, most people have developed levels of natural immunity to the virus.
This natural infection also generates mucosal compartment immunity in the respiratory tract, which the injected vaccines do not produce.
While prior infection does not always prevent symptomatic disease, it does provide levels of protection against severe disease and hospitalisation.
This means the overall risk from COVID-19 infection with SARS coronavirus 2 is significantly less than it was when the vaccination programmes were first instigated.
However, risks associated with ongoing vaccination are probably the same as they were in the early stages of the pandemic and mass vaccination programmes.
If I am correct in this evaluation, this means that the risk of COVID-19 infection has gone down, while the risk of vaccination remains the same.
This fundamentally alters the risk benefit analysis of this vaccination programme.
I therefore consider that the UK government authorities should pause the current covid mass vaccination programme, until a full, population scale risk / benefit analysis is carried out, and published for free and open peer review.
I further call on the UK health authorities to review the intramuscular injection technique used in the delivery of mRNA vaccines. Currently, after insertion of the needle the syringe is not aspirated to ensure the tip of the needle in not in a blood vessel.
This leaves open the possibility of inadvertent intravascular administration, resulting in systemic spread of the mRNA particles in seconds. This would mean that mRNA vaccine particles would circulate, in a relatively undiluted form through the vessels of the major organs of the body.
US public health officials ought to be making the same call, and New Orleans’ Jenny Avegno should be as well. This will not be forthcoming, however. Sadly.
The BEC has spoken with total consistency since April of 2020: protect the vulnerable while everyone else live your lives as normally as possible. It’s as if we could have written The Great Barrington Declaration ourselves.